Found 27 images.
| ID | Name | Collection(s) | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 68214 | TPJ Mask | The neural circuitry of affect-induced distortions of trust | TPJ mask, based on neurosynth meta-analysis for "tom" |
| 68215 | DMPFC Mask | The neural circuitry of affect-induced distortions of trust | DMPFC mask, based on neurosynth meta-analysis for "tom" |
| 805923 | Cooperation > Defection (static decision-making) | Different brain circuits in static and dynamic social decision-making in real-time sibling interactions | During strategic decision-making (4s), participants had to answer the question "what is your plan?" by choosing between turning (cooperation) or continuing (defection). In this contrast, we compared the brain activation corresponding to cooperation over defection. |
| 805927 | static decision-making > baseline | Different brain circuits in static and dynamic social decision-making in real-time sibling interactions | During strategic decision-making (4s), participants had to answer the question "what is your plan?" by choosing between turning (cooperation) or continuing (defection). In this contrast, we compared brain activation during strategic decision-making over implicit baseline (Jitter and inter-trial intervals). |
| 806021 | Males > Females (Defection > Cooperation during static decision-making) | Different brain circuits in static and dynamic social decision-making in real-time sibling interactions | During strategic decision-making (4s), participants had to answer the question "what is your plan?" by choosing between turning (cooperation) or continuing (defection). In this contrast, we compared the brain activation corresponding to sex differences (men > women) during defection over cooperation in strategic decision-making. |
| 25862 | accidental harm - positive (more grey matter associated with increased moral condemnation for accidents) | Neuroanatomical correlates of forgiving unintentional harms | |
| 25861 | accidental harm - negative (more grey matter associated with reduced moral condemnation for accidents) | Neuroanatomical correlates of forgiving unintentional harms | |
| 25863 | Theory of Mind mask derived from functional localizer task (social animations task) | Neuroanatomical correlates of forgiving unintentional harms | |
| 25864 | attempted harm - positive (more grey matter associated with increased moral condemnation for attempted harms) | Neuroanatomical correlates of forgiving unintentional harms | |
| 25865 | attempted harm - negative (more grey matter associated with reduced moral condemnation for attempted harms) | Neuroanatomical correlates of forgiving unintentional harms | |
| 25866 | intentional harm - negative (more grey matter associated with reduced moral condemnation for intentional harms) | Neuroanatomical correlates of forgiving unintentional harms | |
| 805924 | Defection > Cooperation (static decision-making) | Different brain circuits in static and dynamic social decision-making in real-time sibling interactions | During strategic decision-making (4s), participants had to answer the question "what is your plan?" by choosing between turning (cooperation) or continuing (defection). In this contrast, we compared the brain activation corresponding to defection over cooperation. |
| 805928 | Dynamic decision-making > baseline | Different brain circuits in static and dynamic social decision-making in real-time sibling interactions | During dynamic decision-making, participants adopted a first-person driver perspective on the video of their car driving toward the other player's car, including the sound of an accelerating engine. They had to make the decision of whether they wanted to turn and when. This dynamic phase not only increased immersion, but also facilitated the exploration of decision-making within a more interactive framework. In this contrast, we compared brain activation during dynamic decision-making over implicit baseline (Jitter and inter-trial intervals). |
| 805921 | Static decision-making > dynamic decision-making | Different brain circuits in static and dynamic social decision-making in real-time sibling interactions | During strategic decision-making (4s), participants had to answer the question "what is your plan?" by choosing between turning (cooperation) or continuing (defection). During dynamic decision-making, participants adopted a first-person driver perspective on the video of their car driving toward the other player's car, including the sound of an accelerating engine. They had to make the decision of whether they wanted to turn and when. This dynamic phase not only increased immersion, but also facilitated the exploration of decision-making within a more interactive framework. In this contrast we compared the brain activation during strategic over dynamic decision-making. |
| 805925 | Cooperation > Defection (dynamic decision-making) | Different brain circuits in static and dynamic social decision-making in real-time sibling interactions | During dynamic decision-making, participants adopted a first-person driver perspective on the video of their car driving toward the other player's car, including the sound of an accelerating engine. They had to make the decision of whether they wanted to turn (cooperation) and when or continue (defection). This dynamic phase not only increased immersion, but also facilitated the exploration of decision-making within a more interactive framework. In this contrast, we compared the brain activation during cooperation (decision to turn) over defection (decision to continue). |
| 806023 | Males > Females (Defection > Cooperation during dynamic decision-making) | Different brain circuits in static and dynamic social decision-making in real-time sibling interactions | During dynamic decision-making, participants adopted a first-person driver perspective on the video of their car driving toward the other player's car, including the sound of an accelerating engine. They had to make the decision of whether they wanted to turn (cooperation) and when or continue (defection). This dynamic phase not only increased immersion, but also facilitated the exploration of decision-making within a more interactive framework. In this contrast, we compared the brain activation corresponding to sex differences (men > women) during defection over cooperation in dynamic decision-making. |
| 12015 | Figure 1 (Morality) | Parsing the neural correlates of moral cognition: ALE meta-analysis on morality, theory of mind, and empathy | Figure 1, Column 1: Morality. ALE meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on moral cognition, theory of mind, and empathy. Significant meta-analysis results displayed on frontal, right, and left surface view as well as sagittal, coronal, and axial sections of the MNI single-subject template. Coordinates in MNI space. All results were significant at a clusterforming threshold of p\0.05 and an extent threshold of k = 10 voxels (to exclude presumably incidental results). |
| 12016 | Figure 1 (ToM) | Parsing the neural correlates of moral cognition: ALE meta-analysis on morality, theory of mind, and empathy | Figure 1, Column 2: Theory of Mind. ALE meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on moral cognition, theory of mind, and empathy. Significant meta-analysis results displayed on frontal, right, and left surface view as well as sagittal, coronal, and axial sections of the MNI single-subject template. Coordinates in MNI space. All results were significant at a clusterforming threshold of p\0.05 and an extent threshold of k = 10 voxels (to exclude presumably incidental results). |
| 12017 | Figure 1 (Empathy) | Parsing the neural correlates of moral cognition: ALE meta-analysis on morality, theory of mind, and empathy | Figure 1, Column 3: Empathy. ALE meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on moral cognition, theory of mind, and empathy. Significant meta-analysis results displayed on frontal, right, and left surface view as well as sagittal, coronal, and axial sections of the MNI single-subject template. Coordinates in MNI space. All results were significant at a clusterforming threshold of p\0.05 and an extent threshold of k = 10 voxels (to exclude presumably incidental results). |
| 12116 | Figure 1 - Attention ∩ False belief | The role of the right temporoparietal junction in attention and social interaction as revealed by ALE meta-analysis | Cerebral region identified in Activation Likelihood Estimation (ALE) conjunction analysis across reorienting of attention and false belief studies in Montreal Neurological Institute space. Family-wise error corrected P < 0.05. |
| 12117 | Figure 2 - Reorienting > False belief | The role of the right temporoparietal junction in attention and social interaction as revealed by ALE meta-analysis | Neural areas identified in Activation Likelihood Estimation (ALE) difference analyses for reorienting of attention (red) and false belief (green) in Montreal Neurological Institute space. Findings are uncorrected P < 0.001. |
| 12118 | Figure 3 - Anterior > Posterior RTPJ | The role of the right temporoparietal junction in attention and social interaction as revealed by ALE meta-analysis | Co-activation patterns for anterior right temporoparietal junction (rTPJ) versus posterior rTPJ based on a combination of task-related meta-analytic connectivity mapping analysis and task-free resting-state functional connectivity analysis in Montreal Neurological Institute space. Family-wise error corrected P < 0.05. |
| 12119 | Figure 4 - Posterior > Anterior RTPJ | The role of the right temporoparietal junction in attention and social interaction as revealed by ALE meta-analysis | Co-activation patterns for posterior right temporoparietal junction (rTPJ) versus anterior rTPJ based on a combination of task-related meta-analytic connectivity mapping analysis and task-free resting-state functional connectivity analysis in Montreal Neurological Institute space. Family-wise error corrected P < 0.05. |
| 805922 | Dynamic decision-making > static decision-making | Different brain circuits in static and dynamic social decision-making in real-time sibling interactions | During strategic decision-making (4s), participants had to answer the question "what is your plan?" by choosing between turning (cooperation) or continuing (defection). During dynamic decision-making, participants adopted a first-person driver perspective on the video of their car driving toward the other player's car, including the sound of an accelerating engine. They had to make the decision of whether they wanted to turn and when. This dynamic phase not only increased immersion, but also facilitated the exploration of decision-making within a more interactive framework. In this contrast we compared the brain activation during dynamic over strategic decision-making. |
| 805926 | Defection > Cooperation (dynamic decision-making) | Different brain circuits in static and dynamic social decision-making in real-time sibling interactions | During dynamic decision-making, participants adopted a first-person driver perspective on the video of their car driving toward the other player's car, including the sound of an accelerating engine. They had to make the decision of whether they wanted to turn (cooperation) and when or continue (defection). This dynamic phase not only increased immersion, but also facilitated the exploration of decision-making within a more interactive framework. In this contrast, we compared brain activation during defection (decision to continue) over cooperation (decision to turn) . |
| 805929 | Males > Females (Cooperation > Defection during static decision-making) | Different brain circuits in static and dynamic social decision-making in real-time sibling interactions | During strategic decision-making (4s), participants had to answer the question "what is your plan?" by choosing between turning (cooperation) or continuing (defection). In this contrast, we compared the brain activation corresponding to sex differences (men > women) during cooperation over defection in strategic decision-making. |
| 806022 | Males > Females (Cooperation > Defection during dynamic decision-making) | Different brain circuits in static and dynamic social decision-making in real-time sibling interactions | During dynamic decision-making, participants adopted a first-person driver perspective on the video of their car driving toward the other player's car, including the sound of an accelerating engine. They had to make the decision of whether they wanted to turn (cooperation) and when or continue (defection). This dynamic phase not only increased immersion but also facilitated the exploration of decision-making within a more interactive framework. In this contrast, we compared the brain activation corresponding to sex differences (men > women) during cooperation over defection in dynamic decision-making. |